Model comparison
Phi-1.5 vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 27.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-11 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 91.53 | — |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU | 37.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.