Model comparison
Phi-1.5 vs phi-3-medium 14B
phi-3-medium 14B has enough public results to be ranked (#306); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Phi-1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | — | 29.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-11 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 91.53 | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | 47.6% | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | 73.4% | 81.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
Math Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-1.5: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Phi-1.5 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 44.4% | 91.6% |
| MMLU | 37.6% | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | 37.2% | 87.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| BoolQ | 75.8% | — |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-1.5 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
phi-3-medium 14B has enough public results to be ranked (#306); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.