Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 19.1.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.