Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 50.3 to 25.6.
- Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 42.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 27B leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 994 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 27B leads
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?
Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.