Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Palm 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#296); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.1 to 28.5.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 38.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Palm 2: 28.5 (#306), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 995 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Palm 2: 18.2 (#270), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Not comparable
Palm 2: 28.4 (#229), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Palm 2: 21.1 (#290), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Palm 2: 51.3 (#291), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Palm 2: 30.7 (#280), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Palm 2: 25.7 (#299), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Palm 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#296); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.