Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 31.4 to 20.9.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1130 |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1155 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1116 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-32B leads
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.