Model comparison

Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 62.3 to 25.8.

Side by side

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B specifications
Olmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.346.0
Released—2026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked1036

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Coding10161465
LMArena WebDev—1400

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
APEX-Agents—24.9%
τ²-bench Airline—81.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—84.4%
τ²-bench Telecom—97.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Hard Prompts9931448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—58.9%
Chess Puzzles—13%
Thematic Generalization—65.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.65

Math Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Math10181454
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—31.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
GPQA Diamond—86.4%
LMArena Expert—1462

Multimodal Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Vision—1263

Multilingual Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Non-English9771430
LMArena Chinese10141500
LMArena Russian9471429
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1426
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Spanish—1441

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Instruction Following9781424

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Text10321438
LMArena Creative Writing9901401
LMArena Multi-Turn10071446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1478

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper