Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 38.6 to 30.2.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 35.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1018 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.