Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 41.6 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1228 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.