Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Olmo 7b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#295); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Olmo 7b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#295); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.