Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 38.0 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 34.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1185 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1118 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1158 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.