Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 34.4.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 39.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1318 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1255 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.