Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Phi-4 Mini
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1260 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1247 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Phi-4 Mini?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.