Noometry

Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Olmo 3.1 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

37.9

Rank #191 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 46.2 to 27.6.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index37.927.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1535

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding12911093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12721072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13051111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert12951045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12091021
LMArena Chinese12421021
LMArena French12601076
LMArena German12621044
LMArena Russian11931022
LMArena Spanish12891085
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12471053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12721044

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b ThinkPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text12721073
LMArena Creative Writing12261037
LMArena Multi-Turn12521018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper