Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 26.4.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Step 5 Preview specifications
Olmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)StepFun
Noometry Index39.447.9
Released—2026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked1618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding13471480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13221465
CritPt—20.9%

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math13051470
ProofBench—42%

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert13081470

Multimodal Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English12751432
LMArena Chinese13041519
LMArena Russian12681436
LMArena Spanish13361439
LMArena French1328—
LMArena German1282—
LMArena Korean1206—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12991444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query13121455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text13111442
LMArena Creative Writing12641410
LMArena Multi-Turn13091447

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper