Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3-4B
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3-4B?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.