Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.