Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Phi-4

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

30.9

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 33.6 to 19.6.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi-4 specifications
Olmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index38.830.9
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1637

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Coding13461231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —, Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts13221220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.43
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Math13051246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Expert13071203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Non-English12751197
LMArena Chinese13041211
LMArena French13281223
LMArena German12831222
LMArena Korean12061151
LMArena Russian12681209
LMArena Spanish13371234
LMArena Japanese—1158

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following12981201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query13121217

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Text13111217
LMArena Creative Writing12641182
LMArena Multi-Turn13091206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Phi-4?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Phi-4 better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi-4 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper