Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.1 to 9.1.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Olmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index39.429.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1347—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Hard Prompts1322—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—121.23
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Math1305—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond—27.6%
LMArena Expert1308—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1275—
LMArena Chinese1304—
LMArena French1328—
LMArena German1282—
LMArena Korean1206—
LMArena Russian1268—
LMArena Spanish1336—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1299—

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1312—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b Instructphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1311—
LMArena Creative Writing1264—
LMArena Multi-Turn1309—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper