Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Phi-2
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSide by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | — |
| Released | — | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.62 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Phi-2?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#168); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Phi-2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.