Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 41.8 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B and 78.6% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.743.0
Released2024-12-312025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1440

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Omni-MATH15.6%46.7%
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1440

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro31%78.6%
GPQA (HELM)31.6%63%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1417

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1407
LMArena Chinese—1460
LMArena French—1413
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1395
LMArena Korean—1364
LMArena Russian—1404
LMArena Spanish—1435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval73%81%
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1389

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1403

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
WildBench68.9%80.7%
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1334
LMArena Multi-Turn—1416
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper