Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 18.3.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.745.3
Released2024-12-312026-06-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1473

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1466

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
MMLU-Pro31%—
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1440

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper