Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 43.2 to 18.3.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.742.5
Released2024-12-312026-02-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5-Flash leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena WebDev—1244
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1412
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
Chess Puzzles—21%
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1403
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LMCA—29.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.98
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1407
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
MMLU-Pro31%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1407

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1385
LMArena Chinese—1446
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1368
LMArena Korean—1344
LMArena Russian—1379
LMArena Spanish—1400

Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1374

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1392

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text—1397
LMArena Creative Writing—1343
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1393
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper