Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 34.8.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index32.733.0
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding12101081

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts12081079

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math12081116
Omni-MATH16.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English11601078
LMArena Chinese11921052
LMArena Russian11871155
LMArena German—1083

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following11861093
IFEval78%—

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query11941097

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text12181120
LMArena Creative Writing11991149
LMArena Multi-Turn12211108
WildBench73.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper