Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 19.5.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)StepFun
Noometry Index32.739.2
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding12101316

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts12081299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math12081304
Omni-MATH16.1%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
MMLU-Pro41.4%—
GPQA (HELM)28.7%—
LMArena Expert—1279

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English11601290
LMArena Chinese11921331
LMArena Russian11871324

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following11861287
IFEval78%—

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query11941307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text12181321
LMArena Creative Writing11991328
LMArena Multi-Turn12211292
WildBench73.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper