Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs StarCoder 2 3B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
NVIDIASide by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 35.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), StarCoder 2 3B: 32.9
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 21.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 27.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 88.01 |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 21.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 34.2% |
| MMLU | — | 36.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than StarCoder 2 3B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#248); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and StarCoder 2 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.