Model comparison

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 41.8 to 19.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 41.4% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and 78.6% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.

Side by side

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Olmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.743.0
Released—2025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1625

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding12101440

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12081428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Omni-MATH16.1%46.7%
LMArena Math12081440

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MMLU-Pro41.4%78.6%
GPQA (HELM)28.7%63%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1417

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English11601407
LMArena Chinese11921460
LMArena Russian11871404
LMArena French—1413
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1395
LMArena Korean—1364
LMArena Spanish—1435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
IFEval78%81%
LMArena Instruction Following11861389

Long Context Too close to call

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11941403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 2 0325 32b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text12181417
LMArena Creative Writing11991334
WildBench73.4%80.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn12211416

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper