Model comparison
o3-pro vs Ring-2.6-1T
o3-pro has enough public results to be ranked (#105); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where o3-pro leads 55.5 to 40.7.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Ring-2.6-1T?
o3-pro has enough public results to be ranked (#105); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is o3-pro or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.