Model comparison

o3-pro vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

o3-pro and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

o3-pro OpenAI

42.9

Rank #105 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 42.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 23.3% for o3-pro and 10.5% for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o3-pro and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
o3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.942.0
Released2025-06-102026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K262K
Max output100K66K
Input $ / M tokens$20$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$80$2
Results tracked1228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
Aider Polyglot84.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1254
SciCode—29.3%
WeirdML58.2%—
LMArena Coding—1410

Reasoning Too close to call

o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
DTBench86.9%80%
LMCA38.5%29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index147.42142.52
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark72.1%—
ARC-AGI-159.3%—
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1400

Math Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%
LMArena Math—1404

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
Vectara Hallucination Rate23.3%10.5%
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Confabulations14.2%—
LMArena Expert—1408

Multilingual Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English—1378
LMArena Chinese—1457
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Russian—1376
LMArena Spanish—1392

Instruction Following Not comparable

o3-pro: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following—1379

Long Context o3-pro leads

o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
Fiction.LiveBench97.2%—
LMArena Longer Query—1389

Writing & Preference Too close to call

o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko3-proQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text—1395
LMArena Creative Writing—1346
Short-Story Creative Writing84.4%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1390

Frequently asked questions

Is o3-pro better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

o3-pro and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is o3-pro or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper