Model comparison

o3-mini vs Yi-34B

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-mini scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-34B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-mini leads 38.3 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 96.5% for o3-mini and 5.1% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o3-mini and Yi-34B specifications
o3-miniYi-34B
ProviderOpenAI01.AI
Noometry Index36.727.8
Released2024-12-202023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.10—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked5123

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 40.8 (#132), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
LMArena Coding13781112
Aider Polyglot60.4%—
SciCode39.8%—
GSO1.3%—
WeirdML43.7%—
LiveBench Coding82.7%—
CadEval54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o3-mini: 29.6 (#84), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
Cybench22.5%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

o3-mini: 16.3 (#305), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13661104
Epoch Capabilities Index140.34117.39
ARC-AGI-23%—
SimpleBench22.8%—
ARC-AGI-134.5%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis70.6%—
LMCA19%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
ForecastBench59.6—
LiveBench75.9%—

Math o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 28.1 (#244), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Knowledge o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 38.3 (#146), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
GPQA Diamond77%14.7%
LMArena Expert13641061
SimpleQA Verified15.3%—
Confabulations17.9%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 45.7 (#164), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
LMArena Non-English13191079
LMArena Chinese13791176
LMArena French13341081
LMArena German13031042
LMArena Japanese1286993
LMArena Korean1314959
LMArena Russian13041050
LMArena Spanish13211070

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 75.1 (#72), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13371091
LiveBench Instruction Following84.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

o3-mini: 33.8 (#256), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query13431094
Fiction.LiveBench50%—

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 50.3 (#182), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniYi-34B
LMArena Text13371129
LMArena Creative Writing12861108
LMArena Multi-Turn13201113
Short-Story Creative Writing61.7%—
LiveBench Language50.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o3-mini better than Yi-34B?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is o3-mini or Yi-34B better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o3-mini and Yi-34B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper