Model comparison

o3-mini vs Qwen3-1.7B

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #205 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.2

Rank #331 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-mini scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-mini leads 38.3 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 76.9% for o3-mini and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o3-mini and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
o3-miniQwen3-1.7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.726.2
Released2024-12-202025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.10—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked514

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

o3-mini: 41.4 (#116), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
Aider Polyglot60.4%—
SciCode39.8%—
GSO1.3%—
WeirdML43.7%—
LiveBench Coding82.7%—
LMArena Coding1378—
CadEval54%—

Agentic & Tool Use o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 29.3 (#79), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%
Cybench22.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

o3-mini: 16.3 (#295), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles17%0%
ARC-AGI-23%—
SimpleBench22.8%—
ARC-AGI-134.5%—
CritPt0.3%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1366—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis70.6%—
LMCA19%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—
ForecastBench59.6—
LiveBench75.9%—

Math o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 27.6 (#236), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)

Knowledge o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 38.3 (#135), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond77%38%
SimpleQA Verified15.3%—
Confabulations17.9%—
LMArena Expert1364—

Multilingual Not comparable

o3-mini: 45.9 (#159), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1319—
LMArena Chinese1379—
LMArena French1333—
LMArena German1303—
LMArena Japanese1286—
LMArena Korean1314—
LMArena Russian1304—
LMArena Spanish1321—

Instruction Following Not comparable

o3-mini: 75.3 (#67), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
LiveBench Instruction Following84.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1338—

Long Context Not comparable

o3-mini: 33.8 (#251), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
Fiction.LiveBench50%—
LMArena Longer Query1343—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o3-mini: 50.4 (#177), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1337—
LMArena Creative Writing1286—
Short-Story Creative Writing61.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1320—
LiveBench Language50.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o3-mini better than Qwen3-1.7B?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do o3-mini and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper