Model comparison

o1 vs Yi-Lightning

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Yi-Lightning 01.AI

37.1

Rank #209 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-Lightning in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where o1 leads 46.1 to 27.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 61.7% for o1 and 12.9% for Yi-Lightning.

Side by side

o1 and Yi-Lightning specifications
o1Yi-Lightning
ProviderOpenAI01.AI
Noometry Index40.937.1
Released2024-09-122024-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked5218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

o1: 46.1 (#70), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
Aider Polyglot61.7%12.9%
LMArena Coding13671312
WeirdML47.6%—
LiveBench Coding69.7%—
CadEval56%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+80.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1: 24.6 (#117), Yi-Lightning: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons51.1%—

Reasoning o1 leads

o1: 27.9 (#111), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts13711302
SimpleBench41.7%—
ARC-AGI-130.7%—
Chess Puzzles15%—
EnigmaEval5.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%—
DTBench74.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA22.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.91—
LiveBench75.7%—

Math Too close to call

o1: 36.1 (#175), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Math13881300
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)14.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LiveBench Math80.3%—
MATH Level 594.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)9.3%—

Knowledge o1 leads

o1: 41.5 (#110), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Expert13611286
GPQA Diamond76.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8%—
SimpleQA Verified41.1%—
Confabulations11.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1: 34.2 (#93), Yi-Lightning: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Vision1168—
GeoBench80%—
VPCT37%—
SpatialViz-Bench41.4%—

Multilingual o1 leads

o1: 48.6 (#142), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Non-English13581269
LMArena Chinese13941320
LMArena French13441305
LMArena German13371267
LMArena Japanese13461228
LMArena Korean13961192
LMArena Russian13561255
LMArena Spanish13451315

Instruction Following o1 leads

o1: 74.8 (#86), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following13671278
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—

Long Context o1 leads

o1: 50.3 (#9), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Longer Query13781297
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—

Writing & Preference o1 leads

o1: 55.6 (#144), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1Yi-Lightning
LMArena Text13661302
LMArena Creative Writing13481280
LMArena Multi-Turn13691311
Short-Story Creative Writing70.2%—
LiveBench Language65.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1 better than Yi-Lightning?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1 or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1 and Yi-Lightning share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper