Model comparison
o1 vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 23.8.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-09-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
o1: 46.1 (#70), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 999 |
| Aider Polyglot | 61.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 69.7% | — |
| CadEval | 56% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 80.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1: 24.6 (#117), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 51.1% | — |
Reasoning o1 leads
o1: 27.9 (#111), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1371 | 976 |
| SimpleBench | 41.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 30.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 15% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 91.6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | 22.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.91 | — |
| LiveBench | 75.7% | — |
Math o1 leads
o1: 36.1 (#175), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1388 | 1026 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 14.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 80.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 94.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 9.3% | — |
Knowledge o1 leads
o1: 41.5 (#110), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1361 | 980 |
| GPQA Diamond | 76.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
o1: 34.2 (#93), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1168 | — |
| GeoBench | 80% | — |
| VPCT | 37% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 41.4% | — |
Multilingual o1 leads
o1: 48.6 (#142), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1358 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1394 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1337 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1356 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1344 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following o1 leads
o1: 74.8 (#86), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.5% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
o1: 50.3 (#9), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1378 | 988 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
o1: 55.6 (#144), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | o1 | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1366 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1348 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 977 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 70.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 65.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1 better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is o1 or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o1 and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.