Model comparison

o1 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.6 to 25.8.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1 and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
o1Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index40.930.3
Released2024-09-12—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$60—
Results tracked5210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

o1: 46.1 (#70), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding13671016
Aider Polyglot61.7%—
WeirdML47.6%—
LiveBench Coding69.7%—
CadEval56%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+80.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1: 24.6 (#117), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons51.1%—

Reasoning o1 leads

o1: 27.9 (#111), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1371993
SimpleBench41.7%—
ARC-AGI-130.7%—
Chess Puzzles15%—
EnigmaEval5.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning91.6%—
DTBench74.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
LMCA22.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.91—
LiveBench75.7%—

Math o1 leads

o1: 36.1 (#175), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math13881018
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)14.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LiveBench Math80.3%—
MATH Level 594.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)9.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

o1: 41.5 (#110), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond76.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8%—
SimpleQA Verified41.1%—
Confabulations11.7%—
LMArena Expert1361—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1: 34.2 (#93), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1168—
GeoBench80%—
VPCT37%—
SpatialViz-Bench41.4%—

Multilingual o1 leads

o1: 48.6 (#142), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1358977
LMArena Chinese13941014
LMArena Russian1356947
LMArena French1344—
LMArena German1337—
LMArena Japanese1346—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following o1 leads

o1: 74.8 (#86), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1367978
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—

Long Context Not comparable

o1: 50.3 (#9), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1378—

Writing & Preference o1 leads

o1: 55.6 (#144), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text13661032
LMArena Creative Writing1348990
LMArena Multi-Turn13691007
Short-Story Creative Writing70.2%—
LiveBench Language65.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper