Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen2-72B
o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.7 to 21.2.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge o1-pro leads
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen2-72B?
o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen2-72B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.