Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen Max
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Max leads 25.1 to 20.4.
- Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 / $6.40 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 34.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 33K |
| Max output | 100K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1269 |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Too close to call
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1288 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Qwen Max?
Qwen Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.60 per million input tokens and $6.40 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.