Model comparison

o1-pro vs Phi-4

o1-pro and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.5 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-pro and Phi-4 specifications
o1-proPhi-4
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.531.2
Released2025-03-192024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K128K
Max output100K4K
Input $ / M tokens$150$0.07
Output $ / M tokens$600$0.14
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning o1-pro leads

o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
ARC-AGI-123.3%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
EnigmaEval6.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
LMArena Math—1246
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Phi-4 leads

o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Humanity's Last Exam8.1%—
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
LMArena Non-English—1197
LMArena Chinese—1212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1201

Long Context Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o1-pro: —, Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-proPhi-4
LMArena Text—1217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-pro better than Phi-4?

o1-pro and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.5 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Phi-4?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Phi-4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper