Model comparison

o1-mini vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

39.9

Rank #145 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3 leads 27.6 to 8.9.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and Step 3 specifications
o1-miniStep 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index33.739.9
Released2024-09-12—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 35.1 (#218), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Coding13621367
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.3 (#112), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 8.9 (#340), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13331355
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
ARC-AGI-114%—
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82—
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 33.7 (#168), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Math13581366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
LiveBench Math62%—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 34.8 (#180), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Expert13161333
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
Confabulations18.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1-mini: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Vision—1176

Multilingual Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 43.8 (#177), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Non-English12891327
LMArena Chinese13141396
LMArena German12781371
LMArena Korean12231271
LMArena Russian12831331
LMArena Spanish13021372
LMArena French1292—
LMArena Japanese1245—

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 67.0 (#200), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following13041332
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

o1-mini: 40.1 (#156), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Longer Query13211326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 48.6 (#196), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Text13171351
LMArena Creative Writing12441322
LMArena Multi-Turn13141340
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper