Model comparison

o1-mini vs StarCoder 2 7B

o1-mini has enough public results to be ranked (#230); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

36.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 7B in 0 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • StarCoder 2 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
o1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index33.736.5
Released2024-09-122024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked397

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

o1-mini: 35.1 (#218), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.2

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
HumanEval+89%29.9%
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
LMArena Coding1362—
BigCodeBench Complete—27.7%
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.3 (#112), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Not comparable

o1-mini: 8.9 (#340), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
Epoch Capabilities Index135.8292.92
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
ARC-AGI-114%—
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1333—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LiveBench57.8%—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

o1-mini: 33.7 (#168), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
LiveBench Math62%—
LMArena Math1358—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

o1-mini: 34.8 (#180), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
Confabulations18.6%—
LMArena Expert1316—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%
MMLU—38.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-mini: 43.8 (#177), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Non-English1289—
LMArena Chinese1314—
LMArena French1292—
LMArena German1278—
LMArena Japanese1245—
LMArena Korean1223—
LMArena Russian1283—
LMArena Spanish1302—

Instruction Following Not comparable

o1-mini: 67.0 (#200), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1304—

Long Context Not comparable

o1-mini: 40.1 (#156), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Longer Query1321—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o1-mini: 48.6 (#196), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Text1317—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1314—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than StarCoder 2 7B?

o1-mini has enough public results to be ranked (#230); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is o1-mini or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.1 vs 34.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and StarCoder 2 7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper