Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 23.0 to 16.9.
  • Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
ProviderAmazonArcee AI
Noometry Index38.338.6
Released2025-04-302026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output10K80K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$0.80
Results tracked624

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena WebDev—1238
SciCode—36.1%
LMArena Coding—1381

Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—16.5%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—41.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1350
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%

Math Trinity Large Thinking leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1366

Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.9%
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1360

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English—1325
LMArena Chinese—1373
LMArena French—1374
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1311
LMArena Korean—1306
LMArena Russian—1337
LMArena Spanish—1357

Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1334

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query—1355

Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1320
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1342

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper