Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #68 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 41.0 to 23.0.
  • Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.04 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.8 27B specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.346.0
Released2025-04-302026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output10K33K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.04
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$2.30
Results tracked631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 50.5 (#44)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena WebDev—1593
SciCode—46.6%
LMArena Coding—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 32.9 (#57)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
APEX-Agents—47.5%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.0 (#54)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
ARC-AGI-2—42.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—54.5%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—5.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
DTBench—88%
LMCA—41.4%
Surface Evolver Bench—45%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.38

Math Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen3.8 27B: 37.1 (#161)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
ProofBench—16%
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1456

Knowledge Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen3.8 27B: 41.6 (#109)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1482

Multimodal Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 41.3 (#37)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision—1271

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 53.7 (#60)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English—1430
LMArena Chinese—1504
LMArena French—1465
LMArena German—1438
LMArena Japanese—1384
LMArena Korean—1393
LMArena Russian—1415
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#53)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1439

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#70)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query—1450

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text—1441
LMArena Creative Writing—1384
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1671
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1441

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper