Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.9

Rank #127 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 59.3 to 51.0.
  • Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.5 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.5 27B specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.341.9
Released2025-04-302026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output10K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$2.40
Results tracked628

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena WebDev—1358
WeirdML—39.5%
LMArena Coding—1427
ALE-Bench—349.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 27B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
Vending-Bench 2—201.98

Reasoning Qwen3.5 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—47.9%
Thematic Generalization—45.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1414
DTBench—82.4%
LMCA—34%

Math Qwen3.5 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56.7%
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1429

Knowledge Qwen3.5 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.1%
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1428

Multimodal Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Vision—1241

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Non-English—1390
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1410
LMArena German—1393
LMArena Japanese—1345
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Russian—1390
LMArena Spanish—1407

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1393

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Longer Query—1413

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 27B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Text—1409
LMArena Creative Writing—1362
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1410

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3.5 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper