Model comparison

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

37.7

Rank #185 Confirmed

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #166 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Nova Premier 1.0 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 32B leads 37.9 to 31.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 44.8% for Nova Premier 1.0 and 54.9% for Qwen3 32B.
  • Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 32B specifications
Nova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.738.8
Released2025-04-302025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M131K
Max output10K16K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$12.50$2.80
Results tracked626

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%
LMArena Coding—1358

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182), Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1335
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Qwen3 32B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194), Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%
Omni-MATH35%—
LMArena Math—1399

Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
MMLU-Pro72.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%
GPQA (HELM)51.8%—
LMArena Expert—1362

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English—1317
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1311

Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201), Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
IFEval80.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1305

Long Context Not comparable

Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1327

Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads

Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174), Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Qwen3 32B
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1297
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1331

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen3 32B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper