Model comparison
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 35.8 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |
Math Too close to call
Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |
Knowledge Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |
Instruction Following Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1141 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.