Model comparison

Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen2.5-Max

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 35.3.

Side by side

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
Nova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.740.7
Released2025-12-012025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked1927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5-Max leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding13851359
LiveBench Coding—64.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13641360
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—132.53
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Too close to call

Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math13591369
LiveBench Math—58.4%

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Expert13581337
Confabulations—21.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—

Multilingual Qwen2.5-Max leads

Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English13371352
LMArena Chinese13641382
LMArena French13811396
LMArena German13431350
LMArena Japanese12711300
LMArena Korean12841304
LMArena Russian13431353
LMArena Spanish13731377

Instruction Following Too close to call

Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following13351335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Too close to call

Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query13351358

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Max leads

Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text13621367
LMArena Creative Writing12911339
LMArena Multi-Turn13381364
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nova 2 Lite or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen2.5-Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper