Model comparison
Nova 2 Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Nova 2 Lite leads 47.1 to 38.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1385 | 1291 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1364 | 1272 |
Math Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1305 |
Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1358 | 1295 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1337 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1364 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1381 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1343 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1373 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1271 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1247 |
Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1335 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads
Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1362 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2 Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2 Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.