Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen1.5-7B
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 32.2.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen1.5-7B: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1065 |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen1.5-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.