Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen1.5-14B
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen1.5-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.8 vs 32.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 32.5.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 32.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.5 (#259)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127), Qwen1.5-14B: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189), Qwen1.5-14B: 20.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 29.9 (#214)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 29.3 (#230)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.8 (#257)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1115 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 57.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#252)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen1.5-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.8 vs 32.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.