Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen Turbo
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen Turbo?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.