Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1 leads 27.9 to 22.4.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use o1 leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1371 |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1361 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1367 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1348 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1369 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and o1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.